Summary
以下の6つのサイトを使って,CSS圧縮サービスのIcey Compressor, Clean CSS[2006-06-19-17], CSS Optimiser, Flumpcakesを比較.Digg.com
Slashdot
Filmsy
iBegin
Download.com
ESPN
結果
Site | CSS Optimiser | Icey Compressor | Flumpcakes | Clean CSS |
Digg.com | failed | failed | failed | 16.8% |
Slashdot | 17.45% | 51.21% | 9% | 21.9% |
Filmsy | 18.85% | 47.08% | 17% | 29.1% |
iBegin | failed | 55.95% | failed | failed |
Download.com | failed | 45.49% | 0% | 27.9% |
ESPN | failed | 69.84% | failed | 27.9% |
Average: | 18.15% | 53.91% | 8.67% | 24.18% |
順位
1. Icey Compressor2. Clean CSS
3. CSS Optimiser
4. Flumpcakes
重要なポイント
・圧縮率の高さ・再現性の高さ
整形・圧縮をかけた結果,元の表示と違ってしまうというケースが多いようだ.
Reference
Blogging Pro - 20006-08-17 - CSS Optimization: Make Your Sites Load Faster for Free-http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2006/08/17/css-optimization/
Icey - Projects - CSS Compressor
http://iceyboard.no-ip.org/projects/css_compressor
Clean CSS
http://www.cleancss.com/
Online CSS Optimizer / Optimiser
http://www.cssoptimiser.com/
flumpCakes - Online CSS Optimiser/Optimizer
http://flumpcakes.co.uk/css/optimiser/
CSS Formatter and Optimiser/Optimizer (based on CSSTidy 1.2)
http://www.cdburnerxp.se/cssparse/css_optimiser.php
CSS Tweak
http://www.cssdev.com/csstweak/
Factor CSS
http://zamez.org/factorcss
via
秋元@サイボウズ研究所プログラマーBlog: CSSの圧縮サービス比較記事http://labs.cybozu.co.jp/blog/akky/archives/2006/08/css_optimization.html